teamviewer wake on lan via public static address

Some really weird things could happen, and weird things don't go well with live sound. Thus, it's a really terrible idea to try to route it directly across a WAN, because we don't know how the device would react if a timeout was exceeded in a spot it usually isn't, or if a packet was dropped, etc. Because of that, we don't know what assumptions the programmers made, or where error checking is lacking. Realtime control protocols such as the ones between a surface and a mixer, or app and a mixer, etc were written with the expectation they would be used on a LAN - that is, relatively high bandwidth, and low latency. I'm a long time lurker and network engineer, registered just to post this and hope to save you some grief. The VPN router is probably cheaper and easier even after you pay someone who knows what they are doing to set it up. Just make sure it's set to power on after a power failure and at a specific time of day (I usually do 4AM).

The PC thing would be easy, just get something small, get the remote access setup, then run it headless (no kbd, mouse, display). Your best option is either a PC with secure remote access (logmein etc) or replace your internet router with one that supports incoming VPN connections and then VPN into the network like has already been suggested. If you did you'd know how to figure out the ports on your own already. Honestly the fact that you're asking and continuing to ask the question means you've got no business doing it because you don't properly appreciate what you're doing. There are actual websites that log the various equipment types connected directly to the internet - lots of good stuff like industrial control, hvac, etc out there with terrible security wide open for hackers to. Port forwarding would probably work but it's also a terrible idea.

Re: Control Behringer X32 over an internet conection (not a lan)

Teamviewer wake on lan via public static address